Financial Crimes and Negligence law
Overview of financial crime and negligence risk in England & Wales, enforcement landscape, interaction between criminal and civil exposure, and a practical checklist for corporates and advisers responding to investigations or alleged negligent conduct.

Our London office at Holborn Gate, 330 High Holborn, sits at the intersection of corporate, regulatory and criminal practice areas that commonly arise in financial‑crime and negligence matters in England and Wales. Organisations and individuals operating in the UK face a complex web of criminal offences, regulatory obligations and civil duties that can give rise to concurrent investigations and civil claims.
Key offences and legal concepts
Financial‑crime prosecutions in England and Wales typically invoke statutes and common‑law offences such as the Fraud Act 2006, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), Bribery Act 2010, and money‑laundering offences created or extended by the Criminal Finances Act 2017. Regulatory enforcement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and criminal enforcement by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), National Crime Agency (NCA) and local police may run in parallel.
Negligence in the civil sphere arises where a duty of care is breached and loss follows. Professional negligence claims against advisers, directors’ negligence or corporate negligence claims can produce remedies (damages, injunctions) distinct from criminal sanctions (fines, imprisonment, confiscation/asset‑recovery orders).
Enforcement drivers and corporate exposure
Enforcement decisions are driven by evidence, public interest and deterrence. For corporates, particular risks include failure to prevent tax evasion or bribery offences, offences under anti‑money‑laundering rules, and misconduct by employees that leads to vicarious or direct corporate liability. The prosecuting authorities have tools including restraint orders, civil recovery, confiscation proceedings and the ability to negotiate Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) in the most serious cases.
Privilege, investigations and civil-criminal interface
Legal professional privilege (LPP) and the careful management of legal advice and investigation documents are central to protecting a client’s position. Internal investigations must be designed to preserve LPP where intended, while ensuring compliance with statutory obligations to report suspicious activity (for example, through Suspicious Activity Reports to the NCA when required) and to cooperate with regulators where appropriate.
Practical checklist for organisations
- Secure the scene: preserve documents, implement targeted data‑holds and restrict employee access to relevant systems.
- Contact specialist counsel promptly to assess privilege and to guide internal review scope and reporting obligations.
- Map stakeholders: identify regulators, potential civil claimants and internal/compliance leads.
- Prepare an evidence plan: preserve primary records, emails, accounting entries and transaction chains; secure forensic support where necessary.
- Consider voluntary disclosure and remediation options, including early engagement on DPAs or settlement where appropriate.
- Review and enhance controls: AML, anti‑bribery, procurement and conflicts controls to mitigate repeat risk and demonstrate remediation to regulators.
Jurisdiction and sources
- Legislation and statutes: legislation.gov.uk
- Serious Fraud Office (SFO): gov.uk/government/organisations/serious-fraud-office
- National Crime Agency (NCA): nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk
- Crown Prosecution Service (CPS): cps.gov.uk
- Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): fca.org.uk
- HM Treasury and GOV.UK guidance: gov.uk
General information only; not legal advice and not a substitute for advice on a particular matter.
Bring the question into focus.
Contact the London office with a high-level, non-confidential outline of the issue. We can discuss the appropriate next step.

